Incredible quotes – Pius IX


.

Pope Pius IX

June 16, 1846, to February 7, 1878

.

Here is Pio Nono (Pius IX), the longest reigning pontiff and the man who convened the First Vatican Council where the doctrine of papal infallibility was defined. 

Reading a post at The Antipas ChroniclesI learned that Pio Nono made this statement about himself as pope:

“I alone…am the successor of the apostles, the vicar of Jesus Christ…I am the way, the truth, and the life…”

The Antipas Chronicles gave the source as History of the Christian Church by Henry Charles Sheldon, p. 59. I clicked a link at the end of the post and landed at the website highlighted below, where many quotes like this appear:

Appalling Papal Proclamations | Straight from the Harlot’s Mouth

For myself, I needed to verify Pio Nono’s statement, hoping to do this in an authoritative document such as an encyclical. Pio’s encyclicals can be found at the following link. When I visited the page I realized that, at least for now, this task was impossible.

Papal Encyclicals Online, Pope Bl. Pius IX, June 16, 1846 – Feb. 7, 1878

At Archive.org I found Sheldon’s History of the Christian Church. Below is this incredible quote in context. Hang on for a wild ride in papal history! (Emphasis added.)

An advance of sentimental devotion like that which has been sketched meant of course a prodigal strewing of incense before the Pope. In 1866 the Bishop of Bordeaux spoke of the Pope as “the centre of the divine government and the living incarnation of the authority of Christ.”1 Strong as is this statement, it rather yields the palm to that which Pius IX uttered of himself in the same year. If the Ultramontane papers of France can be trusted, the Pope said: “Despite my unworthiness, I alone am the successor of the apostles, the vicar of Jesus Christ, I alone have the mission to guide and direct the barque of Peter, I am the way, the truth, and the life.”2 Another expression, attributed to the Pope by no hostile hand, indicates a pronounced conviction that it was a part of his function to be the death of men as well as their life. Referring to excommunications visited upon those who had invaded the States of the Church and secured their annexation to the kingdom of Italy, he said: “True, I cannot, like Saint Peter, hurl certain thunders which turn bodies to ashes; nevertheless, I can hurl thunders which turn souls to ashes. And I have done it by excommunicating all those who perpetrated the sacrilegious spoliation, or had a hand in it.”

An article of the Civilta Cattolica in 1867 teaches, respecting the relation of the people to the Pope, that “it is necessary for them to understand that from him they derive their faith, from him their religious life, and that he is the dispenser of spiritual graces.”  In an article of the same journal, in the following year, it is said: “The treasures of revelation, treasures of truth, treasures of justice, treasures of spiritual gifts, have been deposited upon earth in the hands of one man, who is the sole dispenser and custodian of them. . .This man is the Pope.” An equivalent statement, written just before the declaration of infallibility, is given in the following: “Christ is the voice of the Father, and the Pontiff is the voice of Christ. The Father in the fulness of time spake unto us by His Son. The Son, after His return to the Father, continues to speak to us by His Vicar. . .Affirming the infallibility of the Pontiff, therefore, means no less than affirming the duration of the reign of Christ upon earth.” In harmony with this sentiment, the opponents of infallibility in the council [Vatican I] are styled New Arians, — impugners of the divinity resident in the Pope. Veuillot, the Pope’s lay shouter in France, did not shim to utter such sentences as these: “The Pope is, like Jesus Christ, the absolute ruler of consciences and sceptres; Jesus Christ, sovereign master of all things, resides in the Pope, not only by the title of pontiff, but still further by that of king of kings.”  

Others also compassed the incredible by calling the Pope the “Holy Spirit” or “the Eucharist.” Gratry, to whom such expressions seemed sheer madness, narrates: “Is it not to myself that a priest, a man very pious, very zealous, very well informed, said and repeated these words. Yes, there is upon the earth a man who can say, ‘I am the Holy Spirit’? It is to myself that a most honorable Catholic writer, after a discussion upon this point, wrote a long letter to maintain, as pious and true, this proposition: ‘The Pope is the Eucharist.'” The meaning of this last expression, notwithstanding its singularity, is sufficiently obvious: it denotes that the Pope, like the eucharistic elements, is the visible shrine of the most holy presence of the God-man. Faber — whose special function seems to have been to carry the Oxford movement to a reductio ad absurdum, through the complete sacrifice of reason to a sentimental and materialized devotion — adopts this view. “The Pope,” he says, “is for us in our whole conduct that which the Holy Sacrament is for our adorations. The mystery of his office as Vicar resembles the mystery of the Holy Sacrament: the two mysteries are intertwined, so to say, one with the other,” He adds: “One might as well try to be a good Christian without devotion to the blessed Virgin, as without devotion to the Pope. The devotion to the Pope is an essential part of Christian piety, an indispensable element of all Christian holiness.” Even Cardinal Manning, though writing under conditions which dictated caution and moderation, has subscribed to the view that all true history is absorbed in the record of the popes. “I am not afraid of defending,” he wrote, “the condensed statement of Donoso Cortes: ‘The history of civilization is the history of Christianity; the history of Christianity is the history of the Church; the history of the Church is the history of the pontiffs.'” When men of note speak with so little restraint, a measure of extravagance can easily be pardoned in the ordinary biographer. We read therefore with a good degree of complacency, in a Life of Leo XIII, that the lamp in the Pope’s study “gives forth that supernal light which illuminates both hemispheres.”

In the line of recent pageants for expressing the worshipful eminence of the Pope, none perhaps has excelled the ceremony of professing obedience at the Vatican Council, in which the cardinals kissed the hand of the Pope; the patriarchs, primates, archbishops, and bishops, after a low obeisance, kissed his right knee; and the abbots, after kneeling, kissed his foot. The scene might have provoked the envy of Caligula, Domitian, and others of the old Roman emperors who received divine honors before their death. When we reflect that this was only a more signal specimen among a throng of kindred displays, we can easily accept the words of the Spanish statesman Castelar when he says, “All this universal homage was only too sure to foster in the Pope’s mind the conceit of his being, not only a singular and privileged mortal, but a very God upon earth.

Sources for the footnotes:

1 Le centre du gouvernement divin, et L'incarnation vivante de 
L'autorite du Christ. (Quoted by Friedrich, Vat. Konzil, i. 499.) 
[the centre of the divine government and the living incarnation of 
the authority of Christ.]

2 Seul, malgre mon indignite, je suis le successeur des Apotres, 
le Vicaire de Jesus-Christ, seul j'ai la mission de conduire et de 
diriger la barque de Pierre, je suis la voie, la verite et la vie. 
(Ibid., i. 498.) [Despite my unworthiness, I alone am the successor of
the apostles, the vicar of Jesus Christ, I alone have the mission to
guide and direct the barque of Peter, I am the way, the truth, and 
the life.]

.

If you’re Catholic or an unbeliever and are offended by what I’ve presented, you should vett it. But more importantly, turn from your sins to the Son of God Jesus Christ! Only He can save you from judgment. His Father will become your Father. Hear His words – they couldn’t be plainer. He made it simple for us,

Matthew 11

28 Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 29 Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For My yoke is easy and My burden is light.”

Paul’s first letter to Timothy, chapter 2

For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time… 

Lord bless you!

.

18 thoughts on “Incredible quotes – Pius IX

  1. Amen darling sister Maria…what a stunning expose! Keep up the good work….the truth will destroy the lies and spiritual deceptions. The devil hates it, but we rejoice in the truth…a rare thing in this hour!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear sister Scarlett, let’s continue to rejoice in the truth and expose what is false and harmful! In this post I decided to follow the example of my brothers and sisters here and clearly present the Gospel.
      Thank you for the encouragement – may the Lord encourage you too!

      Like

  2. i’ll be looking into the links you provided and retrieving more data for my files, for sure. Since the Holy Spirit is the real ‘vicar’ of Christ on Earth, it’s not a huge leap of bad logic to claim to be the Holy Spirit, is it? The masses of Roman Catholics do in fact treat him as if he is the Holy Spirit, although not one would probably admit it. If the teachimg Magisterium of Rome is the authority for Catholics and the M takes it’s orders from the Pope, what else could be going on with Rome?

    Liked by 1 person

    • So good to have you here, brother Dan! It’s good that you zeroed in on the papal logic regarding the Holy Spirit, and yes, practically speaking multitudes of Catholics do in fact treat the popes this way – for their word is infallible for them. They give his word the honor that should go to God’s Word. Strangely, many Catholics are feeling that the current Pope isn’t to be believed and followed, but that he is contradicting Catholic doctrine and morals. Something is happening in all of this.

      Like

    • Pastor Jim, yes, it is arrogance! It’s hard to believe, isn’t it – except as blindness:
      2 Cor. 4 whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them.
      John 5:43 [Jesus Chris] I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Maria,
    I am inclined to believe that the “falling away”, “rebellion”, or “apostasy” of 2 Thessalonians 2:3 was the Protestant break from the Roman Catholic Church in the 16th century. Certainly, the Papacy agreed with the Reformers on that point. Where they disagreed was on the identity of the “man of sin”.
    John Calvin’s summation is, I believe, valid:
    “Some persons think us too severe and censorious when we call the Roman pontiff Antichrist. But those who are of this opinion do not consider that they bring the same charge of presumption against Paul himself, after whom we speak and whose language we adopt … I shall briefly show that (Paul’s words in II Thess. 2) are not capable of any other interpretation than that which applies them to the Papacy.”
    — Institutes of the Christian Religion, John Calvin, 1536.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi, brother David, interesting comment! At first I was stumped by it but I think I understand. Did I get this right? The great falling away from Rome by the Reformers led to the revelation of Antichrist. That makes sense but I believe the great falling away happened much earlier and Antichrist was revealed after this. When the Roman Empire moved to Constantinople and gave Rome prerogatives, the man of sin slowly rose to power – was revealed in time. He was acknowledged both by some Roman Catholics and Bible believing Christian groups and they experienced his enmity just as the Jewish people have. Please feel free to comment. The quote by Calvin is on the money.

      Like

      • Yes, long before the Reformation the Papacy was seen as the throne of Antichrirst. The Bishop of Orleans said in 991 AD that the Romish popes were “monsters of guilt”, and that the pontiff was the “Antichrist, sitting in the temple of God, and showing himself as God.” [The temple of God being the body of Christ, and not a restored end-time Jewish temple.] Interesting that when there were two popes (14th century) — one in Rome and the other in France — they called each other Antichrist. As for dating the apostasy it certainly began before the death of the last apostle.
        What makes it difficult to know whether the apostasia was an early or late event is Paul’s mention of “the day of the Lord” which was thought in the first century to be anything from the fall of Jerusalem to the resurrection. Suffice it to say that in the 16th century, the Papists and the reformers cast each other as apostate.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. David, thank you for giving us more about this subject! I appreciate this. “Monsters of guilt”? True as history shows.

    They have their view of us and we must see them biblically. Rome anathematized the Gospel of Jesus Christ, while the Reformers understood that Rome’s gospel was “another gospel.” In our day, we are “separated brethren” to Rome, while the seat of Antichrist is only one of many denominations to many evangelicals. Though Traditionalist Catholics do still see us as “heretics” and say this. Only GOD’s Word settles this.

    Like

  5. I am not a Catholic, nor am I a Catholic-basher. However, it is enough for me to read in the Catechism that the sacred traditions of the church are given co-authority with Scripture. Despite several places in Scripture that warn against adding to his word, that seems to indeed be what the Catholic church accepts: the tweaking of Biblical wisdom with human wisdom.

    Jesus said ALL AUTHORITY belongs to him. And lest Catholics forget, HE is the head of the church (his body) not the Pope or any other human agency. Jesus Christ is infallible. Holy Scripture is infallible. But Popes (or any other human beings) are not infallible. There is nothing in the Bible supporting such a notion — only in the so-called “sacred” traditions of the Catholic church — and yes, those would be human traditions.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi, retiredday! Thank you for visiting and commenting. I can see that you are not someone who “bashes” people but someone who defends the truth that God’s Word is the only infallible authority and that Jesus Christ is the head of the Church, His body. Catholic tradition twists these things. My prayer is that we have God-given opportunities to be clear and loving witnesses to Catholics and others.

      Like

Please share your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s